Lobbyist Insight

Ohio · GA136

HB 211

Require consideration of caretaker status in criminal cases

20 registered positions on this bill.

Lobbyist or firmFor clientPositionSession
Matt CarleAlliance for Safety and Justice Action FundSep-Dec25
Michala StewartAlliance for Safety and Justice Action FundSep-Dec25
McKenzie K DavisBuckeye State Sheriff's AssociationSep-Dec25
Charles NormanDepartment of Public SafetySep-Dec25
Christopher CorderDepartment of Public SafetySep-Dec25
David WilsonDepartment of Public SafetySep-Dec25
Johann I KleinDepartment of Public SafetySep-Dec25
Ashley ParrimanDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionSep-Dec25
Natasha EwingDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionSep-Dec25
Stephen GrayDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionSep-Dec25
Tyler BrownDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionSep-Dec25
Elizabeth MillerOffice of the Ohio Public DefenderSep-Dec25
Zachary MillerOffice of the Ohio Public DefenderSep-Dec25
Alexander JonesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionSep-Dec25
Emily HaynesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionSep-Dec25
Melissa KnoppOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionSep-Dec25
William DaviesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionSep-Dec25
Michaela BurrissOhio Justice & Policy CenterSep-Dec25
Louis TobinOhio Prosecuting Attorneys AssociationSep-Dec25
Greg R. LawsonThe Buckeye InstituteSep-Dec25

This state records which bills were lobbied but not which side was taken.