Lobbyist Insight

Ohio · Sep-Dec25

HB 211

Require consideration of caretaker status in criminal cases

31 registered positions on this bill.

Lobbyist or firmFor clientPositionSession
Alliance for Safety and Justice Action FundJan-Apr25
Matt CarleAlliance for Safety and Justice Action FundJan-Apr25
Michala StewartAlliance for Safety and Justice Action FundJan-Apr25
Buckeye State Sheriff's AssociationJan-Apr25
McKenzie K DavisBuckeye State Sheriff's AssociationJan-Apr25
Robert A CornwellBuckeye State Sheriff's AssociationJan-Apr25
Department of Public SafetyMay-Aug25
Charles NormanDepartment of Public SafetyMay-Aug25
Christopher CorderDepartment of Public SafetyMay-Aug25
David WilsonDepartment of Public SafetyMay-Aug25
Johann I KleinDepartment of Public SafetyMay-Aug25
Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionJan-Apr25
Ashley ParrimanDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionJan-Apr25
Natasha EwingDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionJan-Apr25
Stephen GrayDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionJan-Apr25
Tyler BrownDepartment of Rehabilitation and CorrectionJan-Apr25
Office of the Ohio Public DefenderJan-Apr25
Elizabeth MillerOffice of the Ohio Public DefenderJan-Apr25
Zachary MillerOffice of the Ohio Public DefenderJan-Apr25
Ohio Criminal Sentencing CommissionMay-Aug25
Alexander JonesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionMay-Aug25
Angela Kay GarveyOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionJan-Apr26
Emily HaynesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionMay-Aug25
Melissa KnoppOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionMay-Aug25
William DaviesOhio Criminal Sentencing CommissionMay-Aug25
Ohio Justice & Policy CenterJan-Apr25
Michaela BurrissOhio Justice & Policy CenterJan-Apr25
Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys AssociationSep-Dec25
Louis TobinOhio Prosecuting Attorneys AssociationSep-Dec25
The Buckeye InstituteSep-Dec25
Greg R. LawsonThe Buckeye InstituteSep-Dec25

This state records which bills were lobbied but not which side was taken.